Sodomy

An open letter to the Supreme Court of the United States of America

The legal basis and authority of our Declaration of Independence and our Constitution for the United States of America, depends solely upon the laws of nature and of nature's God which is commonly referred to as the supreme organic law.  It is expedient to our understanding to learn from preeminent law commentators of the past and the Founding Fathers of this nation.  These men believed and affirmed that the laws of nature and of nature's God were expressed in the Holy Scriptures and that any legislative act contrary to these eternal and immutable principles is to be declared null and void AB INITIO or from the beginning. In addition to a vast amount of other historical evidence, the Holy Scriptures were affirmed and declared to be the Word of God by U.S. Congress in 1982. Since times of antiquity, the judicial application of the laws of nature and of nature's God have been known as common law. Access to the common law, as opposed to the legalistic character of legislative statutes and ordinances, is a right protected by the Constitution. Under common law a devious act may be unlawful even if not expressly stated so by statute and may be effectively prosecuted by the damaged party in accordance with the fundamental legal maxim, to wit: for every wrong there is a remedy.

 With regard to  "Male or female homosexuality and bisexuality...these have been historically defined as sodomy and have for centuries past, in both English and American jurisprudence, been considered an especially loathsome crime against nature and an act so repulsive that it was not to be described or even mentioned publicly.  

The Holy Scriptures explicitly and unequivocally denounce and condemn homosexual acts and until 1961 the "abominable and detestable crime against nature" was prohibited by statute in all fifty States. There is an established and long proven moral certainty that homosexual behavior is dangerously wrong and this divergence is an indisputable trespass against the great legal doctrine of stare decisis- to abide by well settled decisions in matters of law. The recent decision by the U.S. Supreme Court which stuck down the anti-sodomy laws of 13 states indicates either extreme ignorance or blatant disregard for the law on the part of its Members who voted in the affirmative and on the part of the so-called right to commit sodomictical acts of depravity. There are severe social repercussions for protecting, condoning, or failing to prevent the proliferation of homosexual conduct and any serious evaluation of the available statistics undeniably supports this fact.

A flagrant indifference to righteous jurisprudence was displayed by this unrighteous, un-elected and tyrannical court and those Members who supported illegally re-writing state laws in the face of an obvious and overwhelming will of the majority of those states who vehemently oppose the legalization of sodomy. Many voices have expressed grave concern for the health, safety and future posterity of this country, especially for the children and sanctity of family life. Those justices who voted to strike down the anti-sodomy laws of the states could be and SHOULD BE found culpably negligent in their duty to guard and defend the public good if they do not actively pursue REVERSING OR repealing their decision. The Members of the Court, as a matter of law, may also be guilty as accomplices or accessories to the crime of sodomy if their unlawful decision is not repealed. Under the auspices of law, any attempt to confer a right of protection upon the perverse and unnatural practices of sodomites would be a deprivation and negation of the basic natural right to protect oneself and others from health hazards; dangerous and immoral influence, and the threat of physical or sexual abuse, all of which are characteristic of the homosexual lifestyle. If the court fails to repeal their decision then that would establish that this Supreme Court stands in willful and open defiance to the Living God, His law, and His creation of the family, and in order to find relief, His people would have no choice but to pursue a more drastic course of action, i.e. IMPEACHMENT! Let the impeachment proceedings begin!

1642 "Marvelous it may be to see and consider how some kind of wickedness did grow and break forth here, in a land where the same was so much witnessed against, and watched so closely, and severely punished when it was discovered; as much or more than in any place I have known or heard of . . . And yet all this could not suppress the breaking out of various notorious sins, (as this year, among others, gives us too many sad precedents and instances) especially drunkenness and impurity; not only incontinence between unmarried persons, for which many men and women have been punished sharply enough, but some married persons also. But that which is worse, even sodomy and buggery (things fearful to name) have broken forth in this land, more often than once. I say it may justly be marvelled at, and cause us to fear and tremble upon considering our corrupt natures, which are so poorly bridled, subdued, and mortified; which in fact cannot be by any other means but the powerful work and grace of God's Spirit. But (besides this) one reason may be, that the Devil may bear a greater spite against the churches of Christ and the gospel here, for how much they endeavor to preserve holiness and purity among the people, and strictly punish the opposite when it arises either in church or the commonwealth; that he might cast a blemish and stain upon them in the eyes of the world, who usually are rash in judgment. I would rather think thus, then that Satan has more power in these heathen lands, as some have thought, than in more Christian nations, especially over God's servants in them."--William Bradford, in BHOPP, pp. 459-60.

A revealing look at Jefferson and the bill he helped to revise, A Bill for Proportioning Crimes and Punishments.

In section XIV of the Bill, Thomas Jefferson calls for severe punishments. “Whosoever shall be guilty of rape, polygamy, or sodomy with man or woman, shall be punished; if a man, by castration, a woman, by boring through the cartilage of her nose a hole of one half inch in diameter at the least.” Author, Gary DeMar comments, “Jefferson would be attacked by the left for his assessment, which coincides with that of the Bible, that sodomy is a crime. He would be rightly criticized for calling for some rather medieval punishments that go far beyond what the Bible calls for.” Gary DeMar, America’s Christian History: The Untold Story (Atlanta, Georgia, American Vision Inc., 1995), p. 167.

They Intended Sodomy to be a Punishable Crime

Today, state by state and city by city, lawyers and judges are busy striking down or repealing the duly enacted laws of nearly every state and municipality which for two hundred years and more have outlawed the disgusting crime ofsodomy . Using the test of the original intent of ourFounding Fathers who enacted, supported, and enforced these laws against the disgusting, immoral, and disease-spreading crime of homosexualsodomy ; judge for yourself if any of these judges, lawyers, lobbyists, congressmen, and presidents have violated their oaths of office or have given aid and comfort to the enemies of the United States.

On June 27, 2003, the United States Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned a Texas law that forbadesodomy between homosexuals.

"Increasingly, the Supreme Court is less about true law and more about policy and politics." That is the opinion of Steve Crampton, chief counsel for the American Family Association's Center for Law & Policy, which filed a brief in support of the State of Texas on behalf of numerous pro-family organizations. "Today's decision represents yet another instance of the Court not merely declaring the law, but actually making it," says Crampton, who had argued that issues of morality are under the authority of states, not the federal courts. "Under our constitutional republic, it is the place of the state legislature, acting through its duly elected representatives, to decide what is moral," he says. "For a handful of un-elected judges to impose their views of morality is not law, it is tyranny." More details: http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/6/262003a.asp

Court strikes down Texas sodomy law
Citing the 14th Amendment's Due Process Clause, the high court said in its 6-3 ruling that states cannot punish homosexual couples for engaging in sex acts that are legal for heterosexuals.  Critics of the decision differ on the legitimacy of the Texas sodomy law, but they agree the court has usurped the role of lawmakers, establishing a far-reaching precedent that threatens any law based on moral choices, including incest and polygamy. "There is no constitutional right to engage in homosexualsodomy ," said Kelly Shackelford, chief counsel of the Liberty Legal Institute, which filed an amicus brief on behalf of nearly 70 Texas legislators. "Read the Constitution as many times as you'd like. It's not there."

SEND A COPY OF THIS LETTER TO YOUR LOCAL NEWSPAPER EDITOR DEMANDING THE IMPEACHMENT OF THE SUPREME COURT JUDGES WHO VOTED TO STRIP THE RIGHTS OF STATES TO CRIMINALIZE SODOMY!

To the editor:

On June 27, 2003, the United States Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned a Texas law that forbade sodomy between homosexuals, which completely disregards the 10th Amendment of the United States, which reads as follows: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited to the States, are reserved to the States receptively, or to the people." There is no constitutional right to engage in homosexualsodomy . Read the Constitution as many times as you'd like. It's not there. Legal issues of morality are reserved for states to decide.

Steve Crampton, chief counsel for the American Family Association's Center for Law & Policy, said, "For a handful of un-elected judges to impose their views of morality is not law, it is tyranny."

The Constitution provides an impeachment process, through Congress, to remove justices from the bench who demonstrate they will not abide by the rule of law. Unfortunately, Congress will do nothing unless they hear from you.

I implore you to contact your Federal Congressional Representative and demand that impeachment proceedings begin against Justices Kennedy, Breyer, Souter, Ginsburg, Stevens, and O'Connor. Please learn more about this at the InfoQuest* for Truth website at http://fp.users.fast.net/InfoQuest (Click "Government" and "Legislation Alerts").