Page d'accueil

 

 

 

 

 

 

It's SIN, STUPID....

 

 AIDS GET THE WHOLE PICTURE

MEDICAL CONSEQUENCES OF WHAT HOMOSEXUALS DO

By Paul Cameron, Ph.D.

 

                   

Dr. Cameron is Chairman of the Family Research Institute of Colorado Springs, Colorado USA. Click here for more information about this organization. You may contact him at: Family Research Institute, PO Box 62640, Colorado Springs, CO 80962 USA. Phone number: (303) 681-3113.


Throughout history, the major civilizations major religions condemned homosexuality.1 Until 1961 homosexual acts were illegal throughout America.

Gays claim that the "prevailing attitude toward homosexuals in the U.S. and many other countries is revulsion and hostility....for acts and desires not harmful to anyone."3 The American Psychological Association and the American Public Health Association assured the U.S. Supreme Court in 1986 that "no significant data show that engaging in...oral and anal sex, results in mental or physical dysfunction."4

What Homosexuals Do

	                                     

ORAL SEX

 Homosexuals fellate almost all of their sexual contacts (and ingest semen from about half of these). Semen contains many of the germs carried in the blood. Because of this, gays who practice oral sex verge on consuming raw human blood, with all its medicalrisks.

INFECTED SEMEN ANALYSIS

Pathogenic organisms like Pseudomonas, Proteus, beta-haemolytic Streptococci and some strains of Staphylococcus aureus were isolated from the samples which had large number of pus cells (more than 10 per high power field). This can be expected on the basis of the chemotactic property of bacteria and/or their products. The accumulation of the neutrophilic leucocytes, which form the pus cells, is influenced by the positive chemotactic force at the local site and this property varies with the type of the organisms.
Urine culture gave essentially similar growth in 60.9% of the infertile males tested while in 30.4% subjects the urine was sterile (Table 3). It is assumed that urinary tract acts as a nidus of infection for the seminal tract. It is possible that the infected seminal tract, relatively inaccessible to most antibiotics, may then act as a reservoir of infection and may charge the urinary bladder from time to time by retrograde ejaculation. This could, therefore, be a factor in maintaining the chronicity of urinary infections in males.
Rehewy et al8 obtained positive bacterial cultures from the semen of 73% of asymptomatic infertile men. The most common aerobic organisms grown were Corynebacterium, Staphylococcus aureus. Staphylococcus epidermidis, Escherichia colt, Proteus mirabilis, Klebsiella pneumouiae and Mycoplasma, while amongst the anaerobes, Peptostreptococcus and Bacteroides fragilis were mostly isolated. Interestingly enough, 54% of the fertile controls also had a positive bacterial culture, largely confined to Staph. epidermidis, Staph. aureus and Corynebacterium. Obviously, a mere presence of bacteria in the ejaculate does not exclude fertility and their nature as well as numbers have to be taken into account while evaluating an infertile male. Thus, it would be worthwhile to screen all infertile males for a possible silent seminal tract infection and vigorously institute appropriate anti-bacterial therapy wherever indicated by significant semen culture.

 

BRIAT A., DULIOUST E., GALIMAND J., FONTAINE H., CHAIX M.L., LETUR-KONIRSCH H., POL S., JOUANNET P., ROUZIOUX C., LERUEZ-VILLE M.
Hepatitis C virus in the semen of men coinfected with HIV-1: prevalence and origin.
AIDS, 19 (16), 1827-1835, 2005 ; (Facteur d'Impact 2003 : 5,521)
(Services cités : CECOS, Laboratoire de Microbiologie, Hépatologie Adulte)
OBJECTIVE:: To compare the prevalence of hepatitis C (HCV) RNA in semen from men infected with HCV and those coinfected with HIV-1/HCV and to study the origin of HCV shed in semen. DESIGN:: Two prospective studies (HC EP09 and BINECO) included 120 HCV-positive men, 82 coinfected with HIV-1; all had positive HCV RNA detection in blood. METHODS:: Paired blood and semen samples were collected for HCV RNA detection and quantification in seminal plasma and in blood serum; repeated semen samples were obtained for 45 men. HCV RNA was sought in spermatozoa and non-sperm cells. Phylogenetic analysis of the HVR-1 region of HCV compared the quasispecies in blood serum and seminal plasma of two men. RESULTS:: HCV RNA was more frequently found in the semen of men coinfected with HIV-1 (37.8%) than in those with only HCV infection (18.4%) (P = 0.033). HCV RNA detection in semen was intermittent and was positive in at least one semen sample of 42.8% of HIV-1/HCV-coinfected men who provided repeated samples. Men with HCV-positive semen had significantly higher HCV load in blood than men with HCV-negative semen (P = 0.038). Phylogenetic comparison of HCV quasispecies in blood and in semen showed no evidence of HCV replication in genital leukocytes; however, a phenetic structure was observed between compartments (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:: HCV particles in semen originate from passive passage from blood, with preferential transfer of some variants. Nearly half of HIV-1/HCV-coinfected men may intermittently harbour HCV in their semen. Recommendations of protected sex for HIV-infected individuals should be reinforced.

 

Persistent Shedding in Semen and Plasma HIV Viral Load at 6 Months

Among the 64 patients with detectable HIV RNA at baseline and a seminal sample collected at the 6-month follow-up visit, 20 were still shedding HIV in semen.  The median semen HIV RNA level was 11,000 copies/mL (range: 950-930,000 copies/mL). All but 2 of these 20 subjects had a plasma HIV viral load above detection levels. The median plasma HIV viral load among shedders was 22,000 copies/mL (range: <400-1,200,000 copies/mL) and below detection level among nonshedders.

 

Since the penis often has tiny lesions (and often will have been inunsanitary places such as a rectum), individuals so involved may become infected with hepatitis A or gonorrhea (and even HIV and hepatitis B). Since many contacts occur between strangers (70% of gays estimated that they had had sex only once with over half of their partners), and gays average somewhere between 106 and 1105 different partners/year, the potential for infection is considerable.

RECTAL SEX

 Surveys indicate that about 90% of gays have engaged in rectal intercourse, and about two-thirds do it regularly. In a 6-month long study of daily sexual diaries,3 gays averaged 110 sex partners and 68 rectal encounters a year.

Rectal sex is dangerous. During rectal intercourse the rectum becomes a mixing bowl for 1) saliva and its germs and/or an artificial lubricant, 2) the recipient's own feces, 3) whatever germs, infections or substances the penis has on it, and 4) the seminal fluid of the inserter. Since sperm readily penetrate the rectal wall (which is only one cell thick) causing immunologic damage, and tearing or bruising of the anal wall is very common during anal/penile sex, these substances gain almost direct access to the blood stream. Unlike heterosexual intercourse (in which sperm cannot penetrate the multilayered vagina and no feces are present),7 rectal intercourse is probably the most sexually efficient way to spread hepatitis B, HIV syphilis and a host of other blood-borne diseases.

Tearing or ripping of the anal wall is especially likely with "fisting," where the hand and arm is inserted into the rectum. It is also common when "toys" are employed (homosexual lingo for objects which are inserted into the rectum--bottles, carrots, even gerbils8). The risk of contamination and/or having to wear a colostomy bag from such "sport" is very real. Fisting was apparently so rare in Kinsey's time that he didn't think to talk about it. By 1977, well over a third of gays admitted to doing it. The rectum was not designed to accommodate the fist, and those who do so can find themselves consigned to diapers for life.

FECAL SEX 

bout 80% of gays (see Table) admit to licking and/or inserting their tongues into the anus of partners and thus ingesting medically significant amounts of feces. Those who eat or wallow in it are probably at even greater risk. In the diary study,5 70% of the gays had engaged in this activity--half regularly over 6 months. Result? --the "annual incidence of hepatitis A in...homosexual men was 22 percent, whereas no heterosexual men acquired hepatitis A." In 1992,26 it was noted that the proportion of London gays engaging in oral/anal sex had not declined since 1984.

While the body has defenses against fecal germs, exposure to the fecal discharge of dozens of strangers each year is extremely unhealthy. Ingestion of human waste is the major route of contracting hepatitis A and the enteric parasites collectively known as the Gay Bowel Syndrome. Consumption of feces has also been implicated in the transmission of typhoid fever,9 herpes, and cancer.27 About 10% of gays have eaten or played with [e.g., enemas, wallowing in feces]. The San Francisco Department of Public Health saw 75,000 patients per year, of whom 70 to 80 per cent are homosexual men....An average of 10 per cent of all patients and asymptomatic contacts reported...because of positive fecal samples or cultures for amoeba, giardia, and shigella infections were employed as food handlers in public establishments; almost 5 per cent of those with hepatitis A were similarly employed."10 In 1976, a rare airborne scarlet fever broke out among gays and just missed sweeping through San Francisco.10 The U.S. Centers for Disease Control reported that 29% of the hepatitis A cases in Denver, 66% in New York, 50% in San Francisco, 56% in Toronto, 42% in Montreal and 26% in Melbourne in the first six months of 1991 were among gays.11 A 1982 study "suggested that some transmission from the homosexual group to the general population may have occurred."12

URINE SEX 

About 10% of Kinsey's gays reported having engaged in "golden showers" [drinking or being splashed with urine]. In the largest survey of gays ever conducted,13 23% admitted to urine-sex. In the largest random survey of gays,6 29% reported urine-sex. In a San Francisco study of 655 gays,14 only 24% claimed to have been monogamous in the past year. Of these monogamous gays, 5% drank urine, 7% practiced "fisting," 33% ingested feces via anal/oral contact, 53% swallowed semen, and 59% received semen in their rectum during the previous month.

The FALSE notion that urine is always STERILE...

HAS YOUR DOCTOR EVER ASKED YOU FOR A URINE SAMPLE?

WHAT ON EARTH DO YOU THINK HE WANTED WITH THAT SAMPLE?

HE WAS ANALYZING IT FOR SOMETHING...

NOW WHAT DO YOU THINK HE WAS LOOKING FOR?

COULD IT BE THAT HE WAS LOOKING FOR ABNORMALITIES, DEVIATIONS FROM THE NORM PERHAPS?

 

URETHRITIS

Urethral discharge, dysuria, sexually transmitted disease, STD

Urethritis is infection of the urethra, the channel that carries urine from the bladder out of the body. Urethritis may be caused by bacteria, fungi, or viruses.

CYSTITIS

Cystitis is an inflammation or infection of the urinary bladder. When caused by germs, cystitis is called a bacterial urinary tract infection (UTI). UTIs can be painful and annoying. A UTI such as cystitis can become a serious health problem if the infection spreads to your kidneys.

BACTERIA

Bacteria are common in urine specimens because of the abundant normal microbial flora of the vagina or external urethral meatus ....

Diagnosis of bacteriuria in a case of suspected urinary tract infection requires culture. A colony count may also be done to see if significant numbers of bacteria are present. Generally, more than 100,000/ml of one organism reflects significant bacteriuria. Multiple organisms reflect contamination. However, the presence of any organism in catheterized or suprapubic tap specimens should be considered significant.

Since the actual composition of urine varies according to a variety of factors including diet, disease, exercise, and infection, a great deal of information can be obtained about the condition of a person's health by analyzing the urine.

 

CHLAMYDIA

Chlamydia is caused by bacteria called Chlamydia trachomatis.

SYMPTOMS

Chlamydia bacteria live in vaginal fluid and in semen.

The bacteria can move from one person to another through sexual intercourse, and possibly through oral-genital contact. If someone touches bodily fluids that contain the bacteria and then touches his or her eye, a chlamydial eye infection is possible.

Men with signs or symptoms might have a discharge from their penis or a burning sensation when urinating. Men might also have burning and itching around the opening of the penis. Pain and swelling in the testicles are uncommon.

Men or women who have receptive anal intercourse may acquire chlamydial infection in the rectum, which can cause rectal pain, discharge, or bleeding. Chlamydia can also be found in the throats of women and men having oral sex with an infected partner.

 

Conditions of the Male Excurrent Ductal System. Part II

Pathogens causing infectious vasitis include common urinary tract pathogens such as Escherichia coli, mycobacteria causing tuberculosis, and other rare urogenital pathogens such as Haemophilus influenzae. Patients with infectious vasitis usually present with a mass in the groin or scrotal spermatic cord. Thus, vasitis should be included in the differential diagnosis in patients with such presentations. The principle in the treatment of vasitis is identical to treating other urogenital infections.

The importance of patient education cannot be overemphasized. Young adults with history of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are at risk of recurrent infection.

PCR-based detection of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in URINE

M. tuberculosis complex OTN-PCR was positive in urine samples from 88 of 217 (40.6 %) patients with microbiological-positive PTB, 20 of 30 (66.7 %) patients with microbiological-negative PTB and 48 of 84 (57.1 %) patients with EPTB. The detection of M. tuberculosis was higher in the microbiological-negative PTB and the EPTB groups than in the microbiological-positive PTB group (chi square test, P = 0.003).].

 

Identification of HIV patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis using urine based polymerase chain reaction assay

RESULTS---Of the urine specimens from patients with active tuberculosis, all tested positive

 

Urine HIV test receives FDA approval

 

BERKELEY, Calif. — The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently cleared for marketing the first urine test for HIV. Like other commercially available tests, the urine test, developed and marketed by Calypte Biomedical Corp., Berkeley, Calif., detects HIV antibodies. The test is available only to physicians.  People provide a urine sample in a plastic cup and health providers send it to a laboratory for analysis. By not relying on blood samples drawn by needle, a urine test may encourage people to be tested for HIV.  "We have a lot of patients who do not like their blood drawn, and won't come in because of that," said Keith Waterbrook, director of health services for the Jeffrey Goodman Clinic in Los Angeles, one of the largest anonymous HIV testing facilities in the United States. "If we have other methods of testing for HIV, more people will come in to be tested."  Some people who inject illicit drugs do not like to have blood drawn because their veins have been scarred, Waterbrook added.  A urine test also eliminates the need for a trained professional to obtain a test sample, which may reduce HIV screening costs, said Calypte founder Howard B. Urnovitz, PhD. Because a urine test does not require needles, it reduces hazardous waste.  Urnovitz anticipates that the cost to consumers for the urine test will be lower than for other tests because samples require less processing.  FDA approval of the urine test comes on the heels of the agency's approval of an oral HIV test and two home HIV tests. The home tests, which require patients to prick a finger to obtain a few blood drops, enable patients to be tested anonymously.  "All of these tests have their place," said Charles Schable, MD, of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). He is chief of the Diagnostic Serology Section within the CDC's Division of AIDS, STDS and TB Laboratory Research.

Schable agreed that needle-free testing could encourage people to be tested, but he noted that many people who will use the urine, oral or home HIV tests will be the "worried well," people who are at relatively low risk for HIV infection.  People who test positive with the urine test should have a confirmatory blood test performed, he said. With the oral test, a confirmatory test for HIV antibodies is done on the same oral specimen for people who test positive with the initial screening test.  In Schable's view, anybody who tests positive for the first time by the urine, oral or home HIV tests should have a new specimen tested, preferably blood, to rule out technical errors.  Urnovitz stated that the urine test will correctly identify 99.3% of people infected with HIV. This level of accuracy is lower than that of blood tests, but Urnovitz believes that the urine test will increase the number of people found to be infected with HIV because more people will be tested.  An advantage of the urine test over the oral test is that the former does not require somebody trained in specimen collection, Urnovitz pointed out. With the oral test, which was developed by Epitope and is marketed by SmithKline Beecham Consumer Health, patients obtain samples of oral fluid, but not saliva, with a device consisting of a specially treated pad attached to a handle.   Although home HIV tests offer anonymous testing, many patients may prefer the urine test because it does not require pricking a finger, Urnovitz said.

OTHER GAY SEX PRACTICES

SADOMASOCHISM as the Table indicates, a large minority of gays engage in torture for sexual fun. Sex with minors 25% of white gays17 admitted to sex with boys 16 or younger as adults. In a 9-state study,30 33% of the 181 male, and 22% of the 18 female teachers caught molesting students did so homosexually (though less than 3% of men and 2% of women engage in homosexuality31). Depending on the study, the percent of gays reporting sex in public restrooms ranged from 14%16 to 41%13 to 66%,6 9%16, 60%13 and 67%5 reported sex in gay baths; 64%16 and 90%18 said that they used illegal drugs.

Fear of AIDS may have reduced the volume of gay sex partners, but the numbers are prodigious by any standard. Morin15 reported that 824 gays had lowered their sex-rate from 70 different partners/yr. in 1982 to 50/yr. by 1984. McKusick14 reported declines from 76/yr. to 47/yr. in 1985. In Spain32 the average was 42/yr. in 1989.

Medical Consequences of Homosexual Sex

Death and disease accompany promiscuous and unsanitary sexual activity. 70%25 to 78%x,13 of gays reported having had a sexually transmitted disease. The proportion with intestinal parasites (worms, flukes, amoeba) ranged from 25%18 to 39%19 to 59%.20 As of 1992, 83% of U.S. AIDS in whites had occurred in gays.21 The Seattle sexual diary study3? reported that gays had, on a yearly average:

  1. fellated 108 men and swallowed semen from 48;
  2. exchanged saliva with 96;
  3. experienced 68 penile penetrations of the anus; and
  4. ingested fecal material from 19.

No wonder 10% came down with hepatitis B and 7% contracted hepatitis A during the 6-month study.

Effects on the Lifespan

Smokers and drug addicts don't live as long as non-smokers or non-addicts, so we consider smoking and narcotics abuse harmful. The typical life-span of homosexuals suggests that their activities are more destructive than smoking and as dangerous as drugs.

Obituaries numbering 6,516 from 16 U.S. homosexual journals over the past 12 years were compared to a large sample of obituaries from regular newspapers.23 The obituaries from the regular newspapers were similar to U.S. averages for longevity; the medium age of death of married men was 75, and 80% of them died old (age 65 or older). For unmarried or divorced men the median age of death was 57, and 32% of them died old. Married women averaged age 79 at death; 85% died old. Unmarried and divorced women averaged age 71, and 60% of them died old.

The median age of death for homosexuals, however, was virtually the same nationwide--and, overall, less than 2% survived to old age. If AIDS was the cause of death, the median age was 39. For the 829 gays who died of something other than AIDS, the median age of death was 42, and 9% died old. The 163 lesbians had a median age of death of 44, and 20% died old.

Two and eight-tenths percent (2.8%) of gays died violently. They were 116 times more apt to be murdered; 24 times more apt to commit suicide; and had a traffic-accident death-rate 18 times the rate of comparably-aged white males. Heart attacks, cancer and liver failure were exceptionally common. Twenty percent of lesbians died of murder, suicide, or accident--a rate 487 times higher than that of white females aged 25-44. The age distribution of samples of homosexuals in the scientific literature from 1989 to 1992 suggests a similarly shortened life-span.

The Gay Legacy

Homosexuals rode into the dawn of sexual freedom and returned with a plague that gives every indication of destroying most of them. Those who treat AIDS patients are at great risk, not only from HIV infection, which as of 1992 involved over 100 health care workers,21 but also from TB and new strains of other diseases.24 Those who are housed with AIDS patients are also at risk.24 Those who are housed with AIDS patients are also at risk.24 Dr. Max Essex, chair of the Harvard AIDS Institute, warned congress in 1992 that "AIDS has already led to other kinds of dangerous epidemics...If AIDS is not eliminated, other new lethal microbes will emerge, and neither safe sex nor drug free practices will prevent them."28 At least 8, and perhaps as many as 30 29 patients had been infected with HIV by health care workers as of 1992.

The Biological Swapmeet

The typical sexual practices of homosexuals are a medical horror story --imagine exchanging saliva, feces, semen and/or blood with dozens of different men each year. Imagine drinking urine, ingesting feces and experiencing rectal trauma on a regular basis. Often these encounters occur while the participants are drunk, high, and/or in an orgy setting. Further, many of them occur in extremely unsanitary places (bathrooms, dirty peep shows), or, because homosexuals travel so frequently, in other parts of the world.

Every year, a quarter or more of homosexuals visit another country.20 Fresh American germs get taken to Europe, Africa and Asia. And fresh pathogens from these continents come here. Foreign homosexuals regularly visit the U.S. and participate in this biological swapmeet.

The Pattern of Infection

Unfortunately the danger of these exchanges does not merely affect homosexuals. Travelers carried so many tropical diseases to New York City that it had to institute a tropical disease center, and gays carried HIV from New York City to the rest of the world.27 Most of the 6,349 Americans who got AIDS from contaminated blood as of 1992, received it from homosexuals and most of the women in California who got AIDS through heterosexual activity got it from men who engaged in homosexual behavior.23 The rare form of airborne scarlet fever that stalked San Francisco in 1976 also started among homosexuals.10

Genuine Compassion

Society is legitimately concerned with health risks-- they impact our taxes and everyone's chances of illness and injury. Because we care about them, smokers are discouraged from smoking by higher insurance premiums, taxes on cigarettes and bans against smoking in public. These social pressures cause many to quit. They likewise encourage non-smokers to stay non-smokers.

Homosexuals are sexually troubled people engaging in dangerous activities. Because we care about them and those tempted to join them, it is important that we neither encourage nor legitimize such a destructive lifestyle.


References

1. Karlen A. SEXUALITY And HOMOSEXUALITY. NY Norton, 1971.

2. Pines B. BACK TO BASICS. NY Morrow, 1982, p. 211.

3. Weinberg G. SOCIETY AND THE HEALTHY HOMOSEXUAL. NY St. Martin's, 1972, preface.

4. Amici curiae brief, in Bowers v. Hardwick, 1986.

5. Corey L. & Holmes, K.K. Sexual transmission of Hepatitis A in homosexual men. "New England Journal of Medicine," 1980302435- 38.

6. Cameron P et al Sexual orientation and sexually transmitted disease. "Nebraska Medical Journal," 198570292-99; Effect of homosexuality upon public health and social order "Psychological Reports," 1989, 64, 1167-79.

7. Manligit, G.W. et al Chronic immune stimulation by sperm alloan- tigens. "Journal of the American Medical Association," 1984251 237-38.

8. Cecil Adams, "The Straight Dope," THE READER (Chicago, 3/28/86) [Adams writes authoritatively on counter-culture material, his column is carried in many alternative newspapers across the U.S. and Canada].

9. Dritz, S. & Braff. Sexually transmitted typhoid fever. "New England Journal of Medicine," 19772961359-60.

10. Dritz, S. Medical aspects of homosexuality. "New England Journal of Medicine," 1980302463-4.

11. CDC Hepatitis A among homosexual men --United States, Canada, and Australia. MMWR 199241155-64.

12. Christenson B. et al. An epidemic outbreak of hepatitis A among homosexual men in Stockholm, "American Journal of Epidemiology," 1982115599-607.

13. Jay, K. & Young, A. THE GAY REPORT. NY Summit, 1979.

14. McKusick, L. et al AIDS and sexual behaviors reported by gay men in San Francisco, "American Journal of Public Health," 1985 75493- 96.

15. USA Today 11/21/84.

16. Gebhard, P. & Johnson, A. THE KINSEY DATA. NY Saunders, 1979.

17. Bell, A. & Weinberg, M. HOMOSEXUALITIES. NY Simon & Schuster, 1978.

18. Jaffee, H. et al. National case-control study of Kaposi's sarcoma. "Annals Of Internal Medicine," 198399145-51.

19. Quinn, T. C. et al. The polymicrobial origin of intestinal infection in homosexual men. "New England Journal of Medicine," 1983309576-82.

20. Biggar, R. J. Low T-lymphocyte ratios in homosexual men. "Journal Of The American Medical Association," 19842511441-46; "Wall Street Journal," 7/18/91, B1.

21. CDC HIV/AIDS SURVEILLANCE, February 1993.

22. Chu, S. et al. AIDS in bisexual men in the U.S. "American Journal Of Public Health," 199282220-24.

23. Cameron, P., Playfair, W. & Wellum, S. The lifespan of homo- sexuals. Paper presented at Eastern Psychological Association Convention, April 17, 1993.

24. Dooley, W.W. et al. Nosocomial transmission of tuberculosis in a hospital unit for HIV-invected patients. "Journal of the American Medical Association," 19922672632-35.

25. Schechter, M.T. et al. Changes in sexual behavior and fear of AIDS. "Lancet," 198411293.

26. Elford, J. et al. Kaposi's sarcoma and insertive rimming. "Lancet," 1992339938.

27. Beral, V. et al. Risk of Kaposi's sarcoma and sexual practices associated with faecal contact in homosexual or bisexual men with AIDS. "Lancet," 1992339632-35.

28. Testimony before House Health & Environment Subcommittee, 2/24/92.

29. Ciesielski, C. et al. Transmission of human immunodeficiency virus in a dental practice. "Annals of Internal Medicine, 1992116 798-80; CDC Announcement Houston Post, 8/7/92.

30. Rubin, S. "Sex Education Teachers Who Sexually Abuse Students." 24th International Congress on Psychology, Sydney, Australia, August 1988.

31. Cameron, P. & Cameron, K. Prevalence of homosexuality. "Psychology Reports," 1993, in press; Melbye, M. & Biggar, R.J. Interactions between persons at risk for AIDS and the general population in Denmark. "American Journal of Epidemiology," 1992135593-602.

32. Rodriguez-Pichardo, A. et al. Sexually transmitted diseases in homosexual males in Seville, Spain, "Geniourin Medicina," 1990 66;423-427.

33. AIDS Prognosis, Washington Times, 2/13/93, C1.


This educational pamphlet has been produced by Family Research Institute, Inc., Dr. Paul Cameron, Chairman. A complete report is available for a donation of $25 in the U.S., $40 foreign, postage included. Other pamphlets in the series include:

What Causes Homosexual Desire?
Child Molestation and Homosexuality
Medical Consequences of What Homosexuals Do
Violence and Homosexuality
Born WHAT Way?
The Psychology of Homosexuality
Same Sex marriage: Till Death Do Us Part?

Suggested donation for pamphlets: 11 for $5, 25 for $10, 50 for $19, 100 for $35, 350 for $100, 1,000 for $250, postpaid. Remit to:

Family Research Institute
PO Box 62640
Colorado Springs, CO 80962
Phone: (303) 681-3113

The Family Research Report newsletter is $25/year ($40 foreign)

Copyright, 1999, Family Research Institute, Inc.


Back to top of this page

Back to the Family Research Institute Web Site